During Rolling Blackouts Last Summer, California Kept Exporting Power Out of State. There’s Still
When hundreds of thousands of Californians lost power during a heat wave over two evenings last August, Californiaâs grid operators were also â unbeknownst to most ratepayers â exporting thousands of megawatts of power to neighboring states.
Those rolling blackouts, the first in two decades, have been largely blamed on factors like climate change-induced heat waves and the state’s large-scale transition to renewable energy generation. And while the California Independent System Operator (CAISO)Â â a non-profit corporation that manages 80% of the stateâs grid â has acknowledged it also mistakenly allowed power exports at the time, the state yet to come up with a permanent fix to the problem.
The rotating outages didnât last long, cutting the lights for only a small fraction of the stateâs 40 million residents. Just under half a million homes and businesses went dark for as long as 2Â½ hours on Aug. 14, with another 321,000 utility customers losing power for up to 90 minutes the following evening.
The blackouts were relatively minor in scale, particularly compared to last year’s massive electricity shutoffs aimed at preventing power lines from sparking wildfires.
But the mishap exposed a host of statewide grid issues and poor planning, a cautionary tale as California heads into what promises to be another hot, dry summer.
California’s first readiness test has already come this week, with a major heat wave that continues to hit much of the state. Those conditions have prompted CAISO to issue its first Flex Alert of the year â urging people to conserve energy between 5 p.m. and 10Â p.m. on Thursday to prevent a repeat of the 2020 blackouts.
Earlier this year, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) directed the stateâs utility companies to line up more power supplies, including from natural gas plants. Energy storage and conservation efforts have also gotten a boost.
These efforts came after CAISO, the CPUC, and the California Energy Commission (CEC) also laid partial blame for last summerâs blackouts on scheduling coordinators â the liaisons between power plants and CAISO â whom they said failed to secure enough power resources ahead of what ended up being two of the hottest days of the year, according to a âroot cause analysisâ demanded last year by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
At the same time, a software problem signaled that California had excess power that it could comfortably export to other states. As it turned out, though, power demand in California exceeded what was actually available. The report cited âconvergence bidding,â a financial tool that energy traders use to bet on what the stateâs power needs will be for the following day. Although intended to help keep electricity prices stable, the mechanism instead âmasked tight supply conditionsâ during the August heat wave, the analysis concluded. CAISO later said it had fixed the software flaw.
Western states routinely exchange power. To keep up with its massive energy needs in real time, California imports more power from its neighbors â mainly Nevada and Arizona âÂ than any other state. It also returns the favor, exporting excess power when neighbors need it.
But last summerâs rolling blackouts accelerated debate over California’s role in moving power across state lines when demand spikes.
âThe fact that they prioritized exports at the expense of [Californiaâs] load is mind-boggling,â said Rick Humphreys, a retired engineer and power reliability expert. âWhere’s the dividing line between being nice to your neighbors and being overly nice to your neighbors at the expense of California customers?â
Even after months of meetings, stakeholder calls, and workshops aimed at ensuring the stateâs energy operators and regulators are prepared for this summer, the debate is expected to continue well into next year. For now, CAISO has proposed temporary changes to market rules that aim to prioritize Californiaâs needs, including some restrictions on trades that use California’s grid as a pathway to transport power from one state to another â known as âwheel-through transactions.â
“It is critical the CAISO have reasonable measures in place to address this situation more effectively,” the grid operator wrote in a proposal it has asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to approve by the end of this month.
Going into this summer, CAISO and the CPUCâs Energy Division have at times clashed over the specifics of the updated rules. While the CPUC has been generally supportive of the proposed changes, it has also questioned whether they go far enough, specifically raising concerns that they will still prioritize wheel-through transactions over the stateâs needs.
âIf allowed to continue, [this] will seriously jeopardize reliability in the state and undermine the resource adequacy and transmission planning processes,â CPUC regulatory analyst Michele Kito wrote in recent comments on CAISOâs market reform proposal.
Conditions in the run-up to last summerâs rolling blackouts â when CAISO allowed exports of more than 4,000 megawatts of electricity (enough to power approximately 3 million homes) â serve as an example of what happens when exports and wheel-through trades are given priority during tight conditions, Kito wrote. âA durable solution will need to be developed.â
CAISO has expressed confidence that its changes will be enough to get California through this summer, despite reduced hydropower capacity due to drought conditions.
âWe are members of a vastly interwoven western electricity market, both importing and exporting energy. Our transmission system is built to accomplish that,â CAISO President and CEO Elliot Mainzer said on a media call Wednesday afternoon. But he also signaled that the status quo may be changing. âWe are really moving into a mode where what we used to consider one-in-30-year events are becoming truly a new normal, which will force some level of rethinking of what that dependency could look like.âMore adjustments are on the horizon, according to Ben Hobbs, chair of CAISOâs market surveillance committee.
âWe’ve never been as clear as we should have been about who has rights to use California’s grid,â Hobbs said, adding that Californiaâs dependence on imports means it must play nice with other states. âIf we just said to Arizona that they can’t use our grid for wheel-through power anymore, that would really upset how things have gone for decades. You can bet Arizona is going to be really ticked off.â
Hobbs says California consumers must be willing to pay higher prices to secure power when competition with other states tightens during a crunch.Â He likens the state-to-state competition for energy to a game of musical chairs.
âIf prices here are $100 or $150 [per megawatt-hour], whereas Arizona is willing to pay $2,000 at a time that we’re curtailing load, we’re not going to get our fanny in the chair when the music stops. That’s a particular thing that needs to be fixed,â Hobbs said.
Others have blasted the idea of allowing higher prices, especially with so many lingering questions about last yearâs rolling blackouts, including what they ultimately cost ratepayers â a price tag that CAISO says it has no plans to tally.
âWhy would California want to expose itself to a game of musical chairs when it comes to safety and our economy?â said Loretta Lynch, who was president of the CPUC during Californiaâs 2000-2001 energy crisis. âWe should require the CPUC and CAISO to use their regulatory and enforcement authority to lock in clean electricity at reasonable prices.â
Lynch has called on Californiaâs attorney general to investigate CAISOâs role in last yearâs rolling blackouts.
âMy biggest concern here is if California doesn’t get this right, not only does this cost us money, it hurts real people.â
Copyright 2021 KQED