Imagine a giant aquatic vortex between Hawaii and California where converging ocean currents stir a toxic soup of discarded fishing nets, bottles, ropes, toilet seats, toothbrushes, bottle caps, bags, and microplastics smaller than your pinky nail.
Itâs out there, and it has a name: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
You could sail right through it without noticing you are in the midst of almost 2 trillion pieces of plastics churning between the surface and the bottom of the ocean. Most people canât perceive how big it really is.
 âPeople [still] picture a landfill or a dump floating out in the middle of the ocean. That is just not accurate,â says Kara Lavender Law of the Sea Education Association.
Think of it more as an accumulation of little things – a balloon, a red rubber flip-flop, a coffee can – far from where they belong.  In 1972, the sight of these plastic objects in mid-ocean surprised an observer enough that she wrote about it for the first time.
Elizabeth Venrick, a biologist at UC San Diegoâs Scripps Institution of Oceanography, was aboard a research vessel that broke down in the Central North Pacific Ocean. âFrom this vantage point,â she wrote back then, âit was obvious that the sea surface is littered with a startling array of man-made objects, even 600 miles from the nearest major civilization (Hawaii) and outside the major shipping lanes.â
Venrick’s log marked the first scientific record of the garbage accumulation in the Pacific Ocean. The journal Nature published a paper based on their observations in 1973.
At the time, Venrick and her colleagues dismissed the plastic as an aesthetic affront unlikely to enter the food chain and threaten human well-being. Â
But, her article concluded with a warning and a reference to a nursery rhyme. âUnless we find adequate means of disposing of our plastic products soon,” she wrote, “we can anticipate that the âWynken, Blynken and Nodâ of our children will set sail into a plastic sea, accompanied by all the âno-deposit, no-returnâ products of our technology.â
Almost 50 years later, researchers continue to study what Venrick saw, and some ambitious enterprises are trying to apply technological solutions.Â
Desire to Clean
The Ocean Cleanup, a Netherlands-based non-profit, has promised that its technology would remove half of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in just five years. From a list of donors that included Silicon Valley billionaires Peter Thiel and Marc Benioff, the organization raised $40 million.
Last year, it launched a giant U-shaped barrier on the San Francisco Bay. The structure is supposed to function like a coastline that collects plastic from the Pacific Ocean. In a couple of months, a 59-foot end-section fell off and the system returned to land for repairs. The organization relaunched it in June.
International media have paid attention to cleanup efforts – and to the growing realization that ocean plastics are an ugly, harmful and potentially toxic pollution problem for marine wildlife. One thatâs expensive – probably impossible – to solve. Some environmentalists wonder if it’s even possible to clean up the Great Pacific Patch.
âThe goal isn’t to get everything,â explained Mary Crowley, founder and director of the Sausalito-based Ocean Voyages Institute. âI think that is an unrealistic goal. But I think we can help make the ocean a healthier habitat for all the life within it.â
Earlier this year – with the help of satellite-based GPS trackers – the Institute extracted 40 tons of âghostâ fishing nets and other plastics from the North Pacific garbage Patch. The expeditionâs haul accounted for less than 0.1% of the abandoned nets scientists believe are still in the Pacific.
The crew of the Greenpeace ship MY Arctic Sunrise voyage into the Great Pacific Garbage Patch documenting plastics and other marine debris. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is a soupy mix of plastics and microplastics, now twice the size of Texas, in the middle of the North Pacific Ocean. (Ocean Voyage Institute)
Start Near the Shore
There are no cost-effective fixes for the offshore trash problem. Itâll take time, money, political will and technologies that might not exist yet to collect all the microplastics from the vast, constantly moving ocean.Â
One ocean expert, Sherry Lippiatt with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationâs Marine Debris program, offers an idea of how to get our heads around this. âIf you walk into a bathroom and the toilet is overflowing, would you grab a mop or turn off the water at the source?â
To approach this problem at its source, her program makes it a priority to remove debris near the ocean shore.
NOAA has funded a volunteer-based beach cleanup thatâs cleared over two tons of debris and lost fishing gear from the Channel Islands. Itâs also paying for Surfrider San Franciscoâs Hold on to Your Butt program aimed at changing smokersâ habits on and around beaches. On August 15, NOAA announced $2.7 million in grants for onshore marine debris removal and research.
âItâs easier to collect a floating bottle in the harbor than it is â some number of years later – to try to pick up 5,000 pieces of broken bottles, distributed over hundreds of square kilometers in the middle of the ocean.â says the Sea Education Associationâs Law.
Consumer Choice
Experts like her remind us that the enormity of the problem is no excuse for inaction. Consumers can choose to recycle, refill and reduce the amount of plastic we use and throw away. âThe convenience lifestyle [of single use plastic] is not essential,â says Law.
The idea is to learn from what people did decades before they relied upon plastic. In the 1920s, Americans routinely refilled the glass and metal containers that held their milk and motor oil.Â
In an effort to reboot this idea, the recycling company TerraCycle has established a new shopping service called Loop.
âYou can now access your favorite brands – from your Häagen-Dazs ice cream to Tide laundry detergent – in durable refillable packages,â says TerraCycleâs CEO Tom Szkay. Next year, his company plans to launch Loop reusable containers in California, Canada, Germany, Japan, and Australia. He says he hopes people will endorse these products with their wallets and a commitment to reduce and eliminate plastic waste.
In the meantime, though, plastic has made its way into bodies of water many Californians treasure – and into the bodies of creatures including human beings.
State lawmakers are trying to play catch-up by introducing bills that would phase out the sale and distribution of plastics and require a minimum recycled content level in plastic bottles. Each of these bills passed the houses that introduced them and await further consideration.
Copyright 2019 KQED