In the five years before the COVID-19 pandemic, low-income Californians had begun to see substantial wage gains that were slowly chipping away at the long-growing income inequality gap between the state’s haves and have-nots. But the coronavirus pandemic is âlikely stripping away many of these gains,â according to a new report from the Public Policy Institute of California.
The current coronavirus-induced recession has hit low-income workers the hardest, while higher-income workers, largely able to work from home, have escaped relatively unscathed. And the extent of the job losses among low-wage workers â particularly African Americans, Latinos, workers without college degrees and women â has remained worryingly high through the fall, researchers found.
This could be âexacerbating that kind of pattern of recession and recovery thatâs worse for low-income families,â said lead author Sarah Bohn, PPIC’s vice president of research. âIn fact, these unemployment rate differences across income are a bit worse today than they were during the Great Recession.â
The report’s findings are underscored by recent troubling new estimates of monthly poverty rates in the Golden State from a group of researchers at Columbia Universityâs Center on Poverty and Social Policy.
âThe monthly poverty rate in October was actually higher than rates during April and May, despite the fact that the unemployment rate declined over that time,â Zachary Parolin, who led the research, said during at a live-streamed data release.
Thatâs because the federal CARES Act stimulus checks and expansion of unemployment benefits have mostly expired. With unemployment ticking up as Californiaâs new regional shutdown orders go into effect, the picture is likely even worse now.
Parolinâs estimates replicate the U.S. Census Bureauâs annual Supplemental Poverty Measure, which unlike the Official Poverty Measure, accounts for safety net benefits and the cost of living â a measure California consistently tops.
Taken together, the two sets of research paint an alarming picture of deepening poverty and inequality that could take years if not decades for California to dig itself out of.
California lawmakers are already mulling solutions, although though ambitious proposals made at this time of year often get reined in by fiscal realities later in the spring.
Last week, Assemblymember Phil Ting, a San Francisco Democrat who chairs the budget committee, announced his priorities for the session. They included transitional kindergarten for all 4-year-olds, more financial aid for college students, more money for low-income families through the stateâs earned income tax credit and making parents who donât work eligible for the stateâs young child tax credit of up to $1,000.
âOur major priority is making sure we do everything to get money into the pockets of the most vulnerable Californians,â Ting said. âSo many Californians are struggling. Theyâre on the brink of homelessness.â
Toni Symonds, chief consultant for the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy, speaking on a panel about the new poverty data, said that lawmakers are considering expanding subsidized child care for essential workers, salary subsidies for part-time workers at businesses reopening after regional shutdowns and food assistance, such as the $365 the state offered to families with children last spring.
Matt Fleming, spokesperson for the Assembly Republican Caucus, said that Republican lawmakers, too, are focused on getting money into peopleâs pockets as quickly as possible. GOP lawmakers are considering bills to redirect funding from Californiaâs floundering high-speed rail to education, fix the stateâs beleaguered Employment Development Department and repeal AB 5, which makes it harder to classify workers as contractors. Above all, he said, theyâll advocate to keep businesses open and schools in person as much as possible in the coming months.
âGovernor Newsomâs COVID shutdowns have disproportionately targeted those industries that provide jobs to low-income families,â said Senate Republican Leader Shannon Grove of Bakersfield in a statement. âDemocrat policies have left them with fewer jobs, more unpaid bills, and less opportunity for their children.â
Recent History of Economic Inequality
The gap between Californiaâs haves and have-nots has widened markedly since 1980, with the loss of manufacturing jobs, more automation, rising incomes for highly educated workers, declining collective bargaining power and rising numbers of less-educated immigrants, the PPIC report noted.
In 1980, wages for the 10% of families with the highest incomes were 7.4 times higher than for families in the bottom 10%. By 2019, that gap had widened to 9.8%.
Recessions have historically made inequality worse.
The highest-income families generally take a hit of up to 7% then recover within a few years. Meanwhile, the lowest-income families often face âmuch steeper and deeper declines,â of up to 20% in wages, PPICâs Bohn explained. In three of the last four recessions, it has taken them a decade on average to recover their pre-recession wages.
But following the recovery from the Great Recession, things were looking up. A historically long period of economic growth had seen incomes for the poorest Californians rise from $20,000 in 2014 to $27,000 in 2019, a 34% increase that outpaced income growth for the highest earners.
Then the pandemic hit, putting entire low-wage sectors out of work, like restaurants, retail, entertainment, tourism and beauty and barber shops. In the spring, as many as 44% of workers in families with incomes below $30,000 were either unemployed, working part time though they preferred to work full time or had stopped looking for jobs, according to the report. By the fall, that percentage had only dropped slightly, to about 37%.
Solutions on the Horizon?Â
The billions of dollars that the CARES Act pumped into California lifted an estimated 3.5 million residents out of poverty in April, Columbiaâs Parolin said. But that number dropped to 600,000 in October as unemployment benefits dried up.
Another 750,000 Californians stand to lose unemployment benefits on Dec. 26, so if Congress doesnât agree on a new stimulus package soon, California will see rising poverty rates in January, Parolin said.
Whether Californiaâs short-term poverty rates stay high will largely depend on how Congress and the incoming Biden administration negotiate future stimulus packages.
Parolin said the federal government could quickly reduce monthly poverty by increasing the maximum benefit for food stamps by at least 15%, which it did during the Great Recession.
âWhat is clear to me is we need another round of stimulus last month and the month before, if not right now,â said Amy Everitt, president of Golden State Opportunity, a nonprofit that has advocated for expanding the stateâs earned income tax credit.
Bohn emphasized that the state has policy options, too, and that Californians are hungry to fight inequality. In a September survey, PPIC found that 59% of residents thought the state should do more to reduce the gap between rich and poor. The idea was especially popular among African Americans, Asian Americans and Latino residents.
The PPIC report included a list of short-term state policy suggestions: targeting relief to hard-hit businesses, expanding safety-net benefits including to undocumented workers, investing in job training for workers in sectors like leisure and hospitality that may not recover and expanding subsidies for child care.
Bohn warned that âover the long term, getting jobs back is not sufficient for improving the score of inequality.â The report recommends that the state improve long-term economic mobility by investing in access to high-quality child care and higher education, and taking âcorrective policy actionsâ to reverse long-standing underinvestment in low-income and communities of color.
Riverside County Supervisor V. Manuel Perez said more funding for child care is âessentialâ to getting families out of poverty, as is improving broadband access, which he called an âissue of civil rightsâ for children of color.
His largely Latino district, which encompasses the Coachella and Palo Verde valleys, is a microcosm of Californiaâs persistent inequality, he said, even though âthereâs a picture out there that the Coachella Valley is a playground.â
âQuite frankly, it is for those that have, and itâs not for those that donât,â Perez said.
This article is part of the California Divide, a collaboration among newsrooms examining income inequality and economic survival in California.
Copyright 2020 KQED