The Oakland Unified School Districtâs push to begin reopening some schools next Tuesday is hitting a major roadblock: not enough teachers willing to come back yet.
A truncated reopening timeline and unanswered questions about the process have prompted a majority of teachers, who were given the choice as part of the reopening deal, to opt out of returning to their classrooms next week, leaving parents in limbo and administrators scrambling to prepare for returning students.
According to a preliminary list from earlier this week â which district officials say is accurate but subject to change â a dozen elementary schools and several more preschools that had been scheduled to reopen next week will now remain closed until mid-April because none of their teachers have volunteered to return next week. Close to 30 other elementary and preschools will reopen on an even more limited basis than originally planned, because only a small percentage of teachers have opted in.
The district, however, says more than 30 other schools have enough teachers to reopen as planned. Officials have not yet released the names of the schools, and say they plan to provide more concrete information by Thursday evening.Heather Dodge, whose two kids attend Peralta Elementary School in North Oakland, says she was elated when she first heard a reopening agreement between the district and the teachers union had been reached earlier this month. Doing so, she says, would enable her kindergartener to meet her teacher in person for the first time this year.
But when she learned none of the schoolâs teachers would be returning next week, she felt duped. âThey’ve suddenly done this bait and switch,” Dodge said. “I feel really betrayed by it.”
The first phase of the districtâs reopening plan, announced March 14 and narrowly approved by union membership, offers pre-K-second-grade students and some of the highest needs students from all ages the option to start in-person classes on a limited basis beginning Tuesday, March 30. District and union officials said making the return to in-person classes voluntarily for teachers was an effort to practice safety protocols and build trust with staff before more students are allowed to come back April 19, at which point most teachers can no longer opt out.
OUSDâs challenges are similar to what other districts around the country are facing as they work to get students who have struggled the most with distance learning back inside physical classrooms, notes John Sasaki, a district spokesman. âWe expect to face challenges in Oakland under such imperfect conditions,â he said. âWe are working to stay one step ahead and communicate with families, but we know that there could be some unanticipated changes.â
As of Thursday, 38% of teachers had volunteered to return, according to the district.
Reasons vary widely among the many teachers who have opted not to their classrooms next week. Some arenât vaccinated yet and many others say the tight turnaround has left them little time to sort out personal logistics like child care. Others teachers have expressed doubt that the district’s agreed on conditions for a safe and organized return can be met by next week.
âNobody on either side has said âHere is what your room should look like if itâs ready to go and safe,â â said Erin Ronhovde, a third-grade teacher and union representative at East Oakland Pride Elementary School. âMy room, at least, has not changed at all â nobody’s come in to figure out how to open the windows.â
âWhile we are trying our best to move forward together, there are a lot of logistics that need to be figured out still,â said Tim Douglas, a fifth-grade teacher at International Community School, whoâs also on the union bargaining team. With less than a week to go, he says, there are still sites that don’t have air filters yet. âSo those pain points are very real and we’re very aware of that.â
So far, about 50 school sites have had safety inspections by district and union representatives, with another 12 expected by the end of the day, according to Preston Thomas, the district’s chief services officer.
âWhen we find out those school sites that might not have enough air purifiers in the classrooms, weâre dropping them off in those spaces,â he said. âWe are absolutely confident that weâre going to be able to deliver all the materials to the classrooms to make sure teachers are safe.â
Union officials say the inspections will give them a chance to hold the district accountable in meeting the agreed-on safety standards and will also help build trust and buy-in among teachers.
âThose schools, if they’re not safe based on the criteria that we’ve agreed to, they can’t open,â Douglas said.
But for teachers like Ronhovde, facilities arenât the only problem.
Bathrooms at Garfield Elementary School in preparation for students to begin returning next week. (Vanessa Rancano/KQED)
âWe have no idea what our day is going to look like as teachers,â she said.
Hybrid learning schedules still arenât set and may vary from school to school, depending on how many students choose to return, with the expectation that elementary school instructors will lead a distance learning class for all students in the morning and then teach some students in person in the afternoon.
âThere’s no clarity around what we’re supposed to be doing with them during that time [in the afternoon] and how to keep that equitable so parents don’t feel pressured to send their kids back to school,â Ronhovde said. âI’m trying to bring clarity to the people I’m representing at my site and there’s none to bring.â
Ronhovde did not support the reopening agreement because she said she wanted more detail. âI am vaccinated. I do personally feel safe returning to the classroom,â she said. But she still does not plan to return next week because she worries it will end up being a disservice to students. âNothing about this right now makes me feel comfortable.â
Montclair Elementary School teacher Jamila Brooks is among the minority of district teachers opting to return to the classroom next week. On the unionâs bargaining team, she says she feels a responsibility âto help figure things out, and I can only do that in person.â
Brooks notes, though, that returning requires her to take on less risk than some of her peers: sheâs fully vaccinated, doesn’t have vulnerable family members she’s worried about infecting, and works at a school in a community with low COVID-19 infection rates. But as of Wednesday, she still lacked clarity on what her schedule would look like when she returns next week.
School administrators throughout the district are also scrambling to work out what to do for students who show up next week. On Tuesday night, the principal of Peralta Elementary School told parents she was requesting 10 substitutes to fill in because no teachers were volunteering to come back. The following day she said the school would not reopen for K-2 students until April 19.
Itâs also unclear how many students will opt to return in person next week. There are about 10,000 K-second grade students in the district, and thousands of special needs students, English learners, unhoused students, foster youth and other at-risk students across all grades who could also be eligible to return next week. But in a survey released March 11, only about half of families in the district said they wanted the option to send their kids back to in-person classes this spring.
âThere is a heavy monetary incentive for this rush to happen,â said Douglas from the union bargaining team, referring to the $2 billion pot the state plans to distribute to incentivize reopening. For every day after April 1 that a district is not meeting state reopening expectations it stands to lose a portion of the money.
Although the district denies that the reopening schedule is related to the state funding incentive, Douglas and other union officials say they have felt pressure from officials. âWe pushed back at the table that we need a bigger timeline, but OUSD is feeling the pressure from the state. They want to receive those funds,â he said.
OUSD has faced painful budget cuts in recent years, so itâs understandably hard for leaders to walk away from extra funding.
âWe didnât want to leave money on the table,â said school board president Shanthi Gonzales in a text message, though she also emphasized that the voluntary return period for teachers is vital in helping to build trust around larger upcoming reopening plans. âWe wanted to have the chance to make adjustments before the majority of kids are back,â she said.
But the ever-changing dynamic has left Peralta Elementary parent Heather Dodge feeling disillusioned.
âThe political game that’s playing out is making it so stressful for families and so stressful for schools that I fear that it is going to break up public education as we know it,â she said.
Copyright 2021 KQED